President Obama: A Reflective Letter

President Obama: A Reflective Letter

To the glorification of the one, POTUS, Barack Obama:

Dear President Barack Hussein Obama:

map of cuban citiesPlease undertake the mission of understanding this letter. After years, months, weeks, days and whenever I was able to dedicate to those “things” that weigh us down heavily, then through a process of critically making myself aware of the effect, existence, or character of something else and therefore having the ability to see outright the truth of matters that collect upon you, Sir, I wonder if three issues that have been committed by you have been perceived and accepted by you, and if so, I am in wondrous anticipation of what you have said to your daughter’s about the two issues.

Of the first issue — which in my mind is significantly important: How were you able to travel to Cuba and while there fit in a trip to watch a baseball game and do a wave to show your support even though you knew that the terroristic act had taken place in Brussels?

How can the leader of the nation that so many are counting on for help albeit, militarily, financially, refugee status, or for food and shelter, enjoy himself with matters that mean so very little to the entire American population?

carnage in brusselsThen immediately following your recreation time in Cuba, you managed to tango with a voluptuous lady again with further knowledge of what had happened in the blood riddled, bomb bashing, and unfortunately deaths and injuries to those who are in need?

Of my last issue here — within this public letter to you — please understand that I have written to you at the White House, the Oval Office, and to the head custodian hoping to receive something, anything back from you however, to no avail.

Therefore, I ask humbly and filled with modesty about this unfortunate disaster that is happening in our beloved country. I am overly concerned as to why you have never ask my position on matters relative to illegal immigration, runaway visas, the amount of visa overstays especially in colleges and universities from those whom you esteem as the USA’s most prominent resources that of course being foreign students.

Why didn’t you fly back to at least the United States during the unforeseen massacre in Brussels? Sir I believe that this is a civil letter that needs a response by you. Thanking you in advance I remain (one who choose civility),

Yours with regret,

Jon-Paul A. Schilling, ESQ.

pressheader

President Barack Obama is set to shield up to 5 million immigrants

illegalsPresident Barack Obama is set to reveal a sweeping plan to shield up to 5 million immigrants from deportation, revamp the government’s immigration enforcement efforts and overhaul the nation’s visa system, according to senior administration officials.

Interesting so far huh? That original paragraph was actually written in November 2014 and apparently filed by Jeremy Redmon at 6:00 pm for The Atlanta-Journal Constitution. The article is quite good; however, as usual the president still almost two years later has yet to determine some rather significant matters.

I am not going to place all of the blame on President Obama though he does deserve it. Yet it has been the lack of serious reform proposals written by members of Congress, Department of Homeland Security, or anyone within the State department. In fact the only groups of unheralded individuals I know of are those advocacy groups such as NumbersUSA, FAIR, Judicial Watch, and various members of this organization.

DHSThis by executive order, DHS, and affiliate agencies is what we do know: That members of the US Citizenship and Immigration Service, US Immigration Customs Enforcement, as well as members of the Border Patrol, ATF&E, and the FBI are NOT to turn back any persons attempting to bypass a border checkpoint or to cross over into the USA unless they have been arrested of a felony.

This much has always received just a dead gargle from me, especially concerning Arizona where how does one in law enforcement find out or allegedly know if some person is here illegally? The law enforcement within the state of Arizona is under US Supreme Court orders not to ask – as is USCIS, USICE, and our Border Patrol agents.

Therefore let’s ask shall we: What precisely has been done to revamp the government’s immigration enforcement efforts, SURVEY saysNothing! With the exception of changing to an “Open Borders” style nation. What exactly has been done to overhaul the nation’s visa system? SURVEY saysNothing of course with the exception of increasing the amounts of HB-1 and other worker visas.

A big part of the plan would provide work permits and three-year deportation deferrals for people who don’t have legal status but do have children who were born here or are legal permanent residents. To be eligible, they must have lived in the U.S. for more than five years, submit to background checks and pay taxes.

Obama’s plan would also expand a program granting temporary deportation deferrals and work permits to immigrants who were illegally brought here as children. The move would eliminate the age cap in the program — now at 31 — and require them to have continually resided in the U.S. from January 2010 to the present, a change from June 2007.

Further, the Obama administration will sharpen the focus of its immigration enforcement on people with serious criminal convictions and those who have recently crossed the border illegally. Related to that, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has reworked a memo outlining immigration enforcement priorities for federal authorities. He has already released tens of thousands from custody…to roam our streets.

We have been wondering “why” so many felony arrested criminals had been released from jail. One must know it is part of King Obama’s plan.

Most of the above mentioned matters saw the light of day. However in May 2015 an Appeals Court ruled against Obama’s intentions with this plan. Something I have said and again my statement must be stated again for those Supreme Court Justices and all special interest and advocacy groups.

The idyllic notion that Congress will not work with President Obama is an absolute misrepresentation of the truth. Our congress has worked with President Obama to the earth’s end. However, it is when our congress does not agree with the president’s lofty and more than unlawful tactics — is when our congress is entitled to voting responsibilities. The president has the veto and congress has the vote.

When a person tries to undo everything that has been done for at least a generation and pursuant to the people’s wishes, congress votes against that action is congress NOT working with Obama or are they working for the citizens best interest?

arden B

The media…is it fair?

CcmKujIWEAAScEQPlease let’s not all go battsh!t at once! Within the last obnoxious seven plus years the media has been so bad that new names have been accredited to it. How about the mainstream media? The drive by media? How about the lying media? Or simply just the overwhelming misrepresenting media or the misleading media?

Today I was at my Twitter account (public) to answer questions and the like insofar as I have some AWESOME followers at the site. And these people deserve an answers to their questions. So humbly I try.

That is when I noticed a question from a New York Times reporter that wiggles her way into the current campaign. Get this one: 3 million fewer Democrats have voted in the first 15 states compared to 2008, while the GOP turnout has surged. What role has media played in fueling GOP turnout, tamping down Dems’? Signs of Turnout Trouble.

As for me gang, I almost puked right on the spot! Consider if you will how CNN got its name as the Clinton News Network. Furthermore, let’s just look at the 2008 debate between Romney and Obama where Romney made tremendous strides in the need for a smaller government, tax rates, and the immigration problem. So in fact, much to the chagrin of those listening and watching the esteemed moderator cut him off!

Then when Obama in fact was misrepresenting the costs turned into taxes or subsidies she let him continue until Obama outright lied for the 20th something time when he again made law without conferring with Congress.

So, so sorry friends I am just flabbergasted right now. Lord knows that we try and use journalistic integrity here but when matters get so fouled up then it is my service to say something about it. Here are some of the collective responses:
• From a employee at MSMBC — Even MSNBC covered long stretches of his speeches
• From Politico — Donald Trump’s campaign reached out to Speaker Paul Ryan’s operation to chat
• From the NYT They have stirred the pot for sure! Trump got tons of free media for 6 months! But GOP will help: party crumbling & SCOTUS
• Media gave Trump a free platform & now he has emerged as a 21st century Birth of a Nation (Politico)

This is typical liberal bull squat! It certainly was not the media who cherished the notion that at least 17 GOP members along with many debates to cover. As I understand liberals they form (somehow) into these elitist individuals and through their blame and discontent cry, beg, filibuster, ad nauseumuntil the right leaning people just give in.

victorian_line

Stop Hillary Clinton with Your Mind

Stop Hillary Clinton with Your Mind

xlnt brain1You may be thinking, “Oh well, our author has gone nutz — and now he is recommending soothsaying tactics or mental abilities of paranormal use, or maybe he thinks there is a way of coming together as a community and using any plan necessary, let’s contact the ‘Über being’ by chanting, dancing, or doing ancient tribal magic and mysteriously stopping Hillary Rodham Clinton from winning the Democratic Party’s nomination so that she cannot move closer to running in a general election for the Office of President.”

Nah — that is not what this author is suggesting whatsoever. Now for the teachable moment. How many of you have learned anything over the last seven and a half years? [All hands raised up] Good, great even. Now then how many of you learned what needs to be done within the American society that, in fact, has not been done?

Clinton-Email-ScandalHow many of you have actually learned that by a survey and/or poll put out by the Democratic National Party that the number one issue when other democrats were surveyed was “Mistrust and Lying,” pursuant to Hillary Clinton? As it already is this politician is being investigated by the FBI and the Justice department that of course deal with her unethical and apparently unabated use of her own illegal server to transmit Classified or other Top Secret material to whomever she chose.

Allow me to ask you — if Edward Snowden, formally of the National Security Agency (NSA) returned to the United States and decided to run for a party’s nomination would you remotely consider him? So what is the difference between Snowden and Clinton?

Again today I was acutely reminded that Hillary Clinton’s emails were substantially worse! In her emails she listed names of foreign assets working for the CIA. Moreover, Clinton openly exposed the names and locations of American assets working for the CIA.

According to Judge Napolitano, the senior judicial analyst at Fox News, “I saw emails, not 1500px-DesertStormMap_v2_svgthe ones that the inspectors general saw, I saw emails that have been revealed under the Freedom of Information Act. And in them, she is discussing the location of French fighter jets during the NATO bombardment of Libya, how big the no fly zone is, where the no fly zones are, and are you ready for this? – the location of Ambassador Stevens, who of course was murdered, in Libya.

If that is not classified, if she didn’t think that was classified, she has no business being in public office.”

A controversy arose in March 2015, when it became publicly known that Hillary Clinton exclusively used her family’s private email server for her official email communications while she was the United States Secretary of State, rather than using official State Department email accounts maintained on federal government servers.

There is debate as to the propriety of various aspects of Secretary Clinton’s arrangement. Some experts, officials, and members of Congress contended that her use of private messaging system software, and a private server, and the deletion of nearly 32,000 emails that she deemed private, violated State Department protocols and procedures, and federal laws and regulations governing recordkeeping requirements. In response, Clinton has said that her use of personal email was in compliance with State Department laws and regulations, and that former secretaries of state had also maintained personal email accounts.

All this author is stating is to simply use your mind’s thoughts about these already mentioned facts, and then ask yourselves, “Would I want or need a Nontrustworthy, Openly Lying, very secretive person in charge of the United States?”

arden B

What is America Being Made Into..?

What is America Being Made Into..?

MV5BOTA2NjI3ODExNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjU3OTE5MDE@__V1_UY190_CR8,0,128,190_AL_Interestingly we have all watched the horror movies since the beginning of our very lives! When was the last time you or anyone you know gone to the Internet Movie Database (imdb) and if only for a moment just looked into the Horror Section?

It is even more phenomenal for me to look at the particular actors and actresses and seen what their real accomplishments have been say, into the Arts, Business, Social Sciences, and Medicine.

The point that is trying to be made here is that Boris Karloff, Betty Davis, Robert England, Lon Chaney, Bela Lugosi and Vincent Price, are recognized as one of the true icons of horror cinema, and the actor most closely identified with the general public’s perception of the “monster” from the classic Mary Shelley book, “Frankenstein” is Boris Karloff.
The irony about these thespians is that they lived almost dual lives. Most of them achieved high statuses in other fields.

It is also quite well-known that many of today’s stars or celebrities got their original startsMV5BMzc3NjEwNTM1MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDU2NzI5NA@@__V1_UX128_CR0,0,128,190_AL_ in some form of horror or thriller film.

I know that there have been extremely bizarre debates as well as arguments that deal with the film’s rating which as I’m sure you are aware of that the more blood, female skin, graphics, and the like, the more the film must be edited to receive a “good housekeeping” rating.

This genre of film works tremendously in the United States. For reasons that are unbeknownst to me since many of the characters, stories, and scenes come from different cultures living mostly in Europe.

So what does all of this have to do with the U.S.A. and what the country is being made into? Actually, or for the most part, nothing. For anyone that argues I would say that the slasher films or horror films are definitely part of the American culture.

Actually what concerns me is that the USA is a Judeo-Christian based culture; I know that there are some that would love to argue this point — but so, so sorry. There is no argument.

MV5BMTM3NjA1NDMyMV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDQzNDMzOQ@@__V1_UY190_CR0,0,128,190_AL_People say that there are difficulties with guns — is it guns or is it people? Same thing with crime. Speaking of incarceration and the disparities’ that seem too lopsided and I will argue that people are either not looking at the truth or, our system of laws is being too manipulated or, legislation is certainly in the wrong hands. Why should we as a nation, leave the sentencing criteria up to the House or Senate or both? These people do not know sentencing because they are rich and privileged.

Finally if the law states that for a “Third Conviction” a person gets life imprisonment, then anyone disputing that claim should not call for a change in sentencing guidelines (that’s discrimination!) but rather should be challenging the guidelines. One way or another it is always going to come back to the person who committed the crime. Guns, drugs, murder, etc., if the penalty is strong enough without exceptions then the crimes will drop like bricks.

quill5

Just to Make Sure the President follows the Law

Just to Make Sure the President follows the Law

Lawmakers from both parties exchanged salvos Sunday over who should fill the Supreme Court seat vacated Saturday by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

After news of Scalia’s death, Senate Republicans quickly dug in, promising to block President Obama’s nominee to replace him.

Led by Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., they pledged to keep the high court seat open for the next president to fill in 2017.

But Democrats argue that, with more than 10 months left in office, it’s Obama’s constitutional prerogative to fill the seat even if it is an election year.

Not so fast to the liberal faction, we argue. According to the U.S. Constitution the President’s privilege to nominate a candidate for the position of Supreme Court justice is what is at stake. And according to Article II Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution for the ratification of the individual nominated it would take two-thirds of the Senate conferring for the nomination to be approved.

Interestingly I happened on polling data being collected by an agency representing the entire United States by cable television. Accordingly, the results of the poll that asked “Should President Obama wait until a new administration takes office in 2017” 93 percent of the people polled said “Yes” while those who opposed was 7 percent.

It is important to point out that this was a popular poll – one in which could not claim to be a scientific poll. However, this shows that 93 percent of the people favored President Obama waiting until a new administration was seated. This of course means that Obama would not be making a nomination insofar as his term in office would be over.

Many experts allege that this action would solidify a positive legacy for the president.

images

For Basic Public Awareness

For Basic Public Awareness #3

Judge Napolitano, Hillary ‘Wants to Be President, and She’s A Felon’

Why should the American public be concerned about Hillary Clinton’s email scandal?

Judge Andrew Napolitano pulled no punches when he gave Judge Jeanine Pirro his take on Saturday.

“Because she wants to be the president of the United States, and she’s a felon,” he said plainly.

Judge Napolitano sat down on Justice on Saturday to weigh the dangers of a potential President Hillary Clinton.

Clinton’s emails “are important, because they show the manner and methods by which the United States government acquires foreign intelligence,” he explained.

Judge Napolitano said that Clinton “has shown a cavalier attitude about preserving these secrets,” as well as the names of “people, who if their names came out, would be dead.”

This “violates an oath she took when she became Secretary of State, which violates the same federal criminal statute that was used to prosecute General Petraeus,” he said.

“She should be indicted for it.”

quote_top3

In other related matters:

Parents and community members are outraged over a so-called “white guilt video” that was shown to high school students in Virginia.

“The Unequal Opportunity Race,” a four-minute animated video that was shown at Glen Allen High School in Henrico, was designed as a lesson in “racial discourse” for students, according to school officials.

Now, there is backlash from those who take issue with not-so subtle references to white privilege throughout the video. (What is “white privilege?”)

They are bombarded with words such as “slavery,” “broken treaties,” “genocide” and “segregation.”

The white athletes continually run around the track, getting older as their batons – marked with a money symbol – grow larger and larger. Eventually, they hand the baton off to a younger white athlete running beside them.

School officials have defended the video as a lesson in “American history and racial discourse.”

 

arden B

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 353 other followers