The Sickening Abuses and Schemes of Obama

Earlier this morning after a brief discussion with our team I stated that “My fear is of major concern for our Nation – it’s not about various policies that like brief streams of wind come and go because for what it’s worth that is precisely what politicians do (and the staff here realize that I am definitely referring to human communication, twisting words, and making mockery out of context within a given content – [continuing] I stated that my biggest fear for me, mine, you, yours, and the entire lot of people living in America is none other than this man…Barack Obama.”

Paraphrasing here I also made mention of how could anyone living in this nation – America – possibly vote for this guy. Furthermore, upon being asked why, I very simply stated that I felt that not only was President Obama not qualified to be the POTUS; moreover, I feel that he is dangerous to the health, safety, and welfare of the Nation.

Naturally our earlier briefing session was longer than any of us thought it would be but there is one complete line of substantiated facts that we will never hear at a debate, or any public policy speech.

There should not be an American or anyone existing in this country that could possibly turn a blind eye, or non-hearing ears to the travesties that have occurred on Barack Obama’s watch – yet with the assistance of the mainstream media, as well as the gullibility of the people, including the lassie-faire consciousness and reluctance for people to do – efficacy – the notion of making a change in the political system of our nation. Therefore, again I reiterated that a vote for any other person running for the office of the President of the United States would be better than a condoning vote for Barack Obama.

We have addressed the relationship of content and context on this site for years. In addition, we have discussed the options of comparing and contrasting events. These parameters often used in History classes or Literature classes in the form of essays are asking for just that; foretelling by comparing or contrasting the facts that have occurred with what would or could be a more desirable outcome.

First we want to address content of what was stated by Obama on Sunday September 12, 2012 and we will present to you the actual words. Our question is what context was the language used? For example, was the President explaining an event that occurred; or, was he manipulating all of the content to prove his assertion that he did in fact, call the events that happened in Benghazi, Libya a “Terrorist Attack”?

From this point it is very conceivable that based on how the content was manipulated (out of context) as to why the events of the next fourteen days occurred namely the use of a video tape, a non-structured riot, the Nation’s Ambassador to the United Nations making appearances on all the Sunday morning shows, and finally the gumption of an unbiased press to contrast the White House’s story and subsequently, the official story.

The following is a transcript of the actual proceedings pursuant to last night’s debate with special emphasis given to the content, context, and the comparing and contrasting that for me represent a clear and present danger to those of us in America with Barack Obama as president.

Mr. Obama did make reference to the fact that “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,” but his comments that day also appeared to reference the video, when he said, “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.” The administration changed its description of the attack, eventually describing it as a terror attack linked to al Qaeda sympathizers. Although this is what President Obama claims as his definition of calling what happened in Benghazi a “Terrorist” attack? “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.”

Please see today’s edition of the Wall Street Journal for a complete analysis with text and video to support what was actually said. Please click here.

Please understand that the attempt of President Obama alleging that in the Rose Garden he made mention of the Benghazi attack remotely or even quasi-significant as a “Terrorist attack” is nothing more than manipulation of content within the parameters of the communiqué. This is what is often referred to as “taken out of context” and in this instance he sure did. The manipulation of words is perhaps one of the most deceitful means of scheming and launching horrendous fabrications.

“But let him ask in faith without any doubting, for the one who doubts is like the surf of the sea driven and tossed by the wind. For let not that man expect that he will receive anything from the Lord, being a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways.” (James 1:6-8)

%d bloggers like this: