Would or could someone tell me what a U.S. Senator does?

Would or could someone tell me what a U.S. Senator does?

 I believe, with extraordinary support, that the “chamber” in this nation we refer to as the Senate is a worthless group of people who have sold their bill of goods to someone who actually bought them.  So, please join in with me and assist me even more with what it is exactly that this “chamber” of people do for you, the nation, or for anything or anyone.

Trying to be as diligent as possible, yet at the same time wanting to be as gentle and straight forward as I can be, I will openly admit that I have been around a few years. I certainly am not saying that I am old – because I am not. If I look at the scriptures to come to a reasonable figure pursuant to my own age – I would say that I have acquired wisdom, and that feature is based on what I have learned, and by far the most important ingredient that unites the three-fold accumulation of age – scripturally – is found in the ability to discern the understanding.

And this notion or idea my friends is where the obstacle or obstruction gave that “chamber” that is so coveted in our nation. Frankly, I believed the entire process of becoming a U.S. sitting Senator, is literally an amount of bull squat that one promises and hopes to accomplish. I certainly do not want to think that I live in this kind of a mess, but the reality is, that I do.

My own personal belief is that the selling process (for the vote), in order to become a senator, lies with the relationship that a person has with their local government. This is where the most fundamental promise can be dreamt up and delivered to an ever-so-hungry person. Special favors as in cash and other sundries along with pork or money can be made for the promise of bridge building, road maintenance, and other amenities delivered to the community. I firmly believe that promises within the failing educational system are made. Therefore, as it may be if a senator is able to siphon off enough funding for in and around “their” constituency, well, far more the better.

Moreover, now let’s address the big-time office space that holds the lobbyists and special interest groups. Not many people are privy to the notion that the National Council of La Raza, the largest group of individuals pushing for Immigration Reform like the normal person asks for salvation. Most people do not know that La Raza receives funding from the U.S. government for alleging to assist immigrants. Notice, that I say immigrants and not illegal immigrants! First by their filing with the IRS having to do with a not for profit status entity, as well as petitioning the government for more funding pursuant to what they allege that their organization does.

Now then, what do you suppose a U.S. Senator or House Representative receives if they are successful in fundraising (sort of off the books) for a special interest group? Hum.

Now what has gotten me to a spill the beans attitude nowadays is this, how does an organization with an 8 percent approval rating even get invited to dinner by the organization?  Now I openly share with you that I personally have been promised a wall to assist our border patrol for in excess of 20 years to keep it within reality – basically since 1996. And although I have paid my fair share for that wall, it still isn’t there. Facial recognition apparatus? Another unfulfilled promise. These U.S. “Senators” have waffled back and forth on integrating the E-Verify program, as well as the community assistance between local law enforcement with federal agency back-up, support, and assistance referred to as Section 287g federal assistance.

Take the fundamental learning of what has not been done that was supposed to, Section 287g, E-Verify programs, biological recognition programs, ending rather than accumulating more visas, and simply understanding that this is entirely a close held joking secret that their make untold scores of money on, and just let your wisdom run with this one gang – we are being taken by an eight percent approval rating group of misfits with fat double chins and hanging joules making their insider trading money and on, and on, ad nauseam.

Arden V

Advertisements

Is it possible to work together?

Is it possible to work together?

flageag9Far be it from me but it appears that there is a very unique situation that exists in political Washington D.C. I am not even going to try and attempt to mention when the last time the Republican party held all facets of the government. Republicans definitely got the edge in the House as well as any edge they ever needed in the Senate and add to that the Presidency!

One would think that this is the time that ‘politically’ Republicans would be going for anything and virtually everything that has been denied them through the extremes of the Democrat party. Say for instance, that the Republicans of the state of California wanted some get back for having voted to ban same-sex marriage than through a court the judges decided “Nah” forget the referendum and initiative bit called out there, Propositions.

Or in another instance, the people of the same state want some issue for the immigration165px-sen_mitch_mcconnell_official_cropped falsities that have been going on. Again, “Nah” not the American way. So, let’s put together the gang of eight; subsequently, the worst four Senators in the Republican party! So please, someone please help me out here, okay? What has this man Mitch McConnell done for you or me or the country lately other than vote for what Obama wanted; moreover, vote for the guy who has given the Chinese (ergo, the entire Southeastern Asian populace) the greatest advantage known in the US or world history?

monica-billy

What has John McCain with legitimacy done for the US lately? It sure as heck is not his Senate seat! Let’s just go from memory, shall we? Clinton, William “Bill” was known to have allowed certain Top-Secret codes to get into Chinese hands. McCain was a senator then. Arizona is a great state that befell a lot when Obama was in office. McCain was a senator then too! So outside of being a POW when does he start working for the USA?

Funny thing about the names mentioned so far and furthermore now as well. What the

graham McCain

McCain and (R) Graham

heck has Sen. Lindsey Graham done for this nation? He also was a gang of eight members who had it not been for a couple of other senators in the same region cutting him down a peg or two actually voted for amnesty for the illegals.

All things being equal, I have not seen nor experienced albeit through television or reading that any of these loyal Republicans have done to at least assist President Trump.

06comeytranscript-master768 (1)

Former FBI

Even in word, like “nice job chief.” As far as I am concerned, there is a lot of noise coming from the bowels of the swamp. So people, shut them up. Not a word about tearing and ripping the history of the US apart, just keep on, keeping on and collude with the FBI, special interest groups, and the thought that not one of you will do anything to better off our country. If so, I am here all year and waiting for your responses.

quill5

Visas, Immigration, Illegal Immigration, Population Control, Wars, Religions, and Discrimination

Visas, Immigration, Illegal Immigration, Population Control, Wars, Religions, and Discrimination

As faimagesCAJK81ZEr as we see it – “it” being the operative word for the conditions currently going on in the United States – and seriously asking ourselves, “How good for us is all the squabbling.”  I’m not the first person to wonder about the rubbish we, as a nation, have gotten ourselves into; however, I would like to be ahead in the line of who it is that is trying with due-diligence to stop and get out of” it.”

And I will openly admit that I feel that the mainstream media has a firm foothold on how public policy and how American awareness feels about it. Therefore please, allow me to ask you a question and just hopefully we’ll get some responses to this question: “America is in trouble, what we can do to help our current government end this trouble?”

Just some fundamentals for us. Should the government (for whatever reason) continue to have a free give away Diversity Lottery on visas for 80,000 or more people per year?

In this article, it should be made known that at least 50% of all legal immigrants coming to America are awarded entitlements as at their arrival? What does good moral character mean? Do you feel as though so kind of legislation should be made prohibiting these individuals from gaining access to the USA?

And this entire notion of while a person is here in the USA while visiting from Russia, Iran, or Mexico, or anywhere for that matter, who goes into labor gives birth and WHAM! They have got a US citizen in their hands, which in turn makes every member of that child’s family or extended family worthy of receiving entitlements? Is that fair?

Now as for Senator’s: Schumer, Rubio, Graham, McCain, Flake, Durbin, Menendez, and Bennett commonly referred to as The Gang of Eight collectively these 8 senators wrote the first draft of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013, commonly known as “the immigration bill.” As we already know, the House didn’t even look at the Bill so it was basically debunked on release. Did the USA need another Sub-Committee?

scalesDo we need to reevaluate the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 to regain control of our country? Currently, that act is viewed by most not as lifting the limits of immigrants from certain countries as much as with the Kennedy backing it is viewed now to be an act of civil rights legislation and those rights for potential immigrants. From the act itself”

  • It created a seven-category preference system, which gave priority to relatives of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents and to professionals and other individuals with specialized skills.
  • Immediate relatives and “special immigrants” were not subject to numerical restrictions. Some of the “special immigrants” include ministers, former employees of the U.S. government, foreign medical graduates, among others.
  • It added a labor certification requirement, which dictated that the Secretary of Labor needed to certify labor shortages.
  • Refugees were given the seventh and last category preference with the possibility of adjusting their status. However, refugees could enter the United States through other means as well like those seeking temporary asylum. How much has this notion changed?

Even if America is the land of opportunity why do politicians feel it’s necessary to spread that opportunity immediately?

CLOUD finger-illusionsDid you understand what the leader of Iraq meant when he stated, “Death to America and Israel”? Why is it so important to give visas to people who disagree with our way of life? This is confusing to me. “Let their blood run down the streets” is something we hear, beheading innocent individuals is just another thing we see. How long will it be until America shows the fortitude it once had?

Arden V

What is America Being Made Into..?

What is America Being Made Into..?

MV5BOTA2NjI3ODExNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjU3OTE5MDE@__V1_UY190_CR8,0,128,190_AL_Interestingly we have all watched the horror movies since the beginning of our very lives! When was the last time you or anyone you know gone to the Internet Movie Database (imdb) and if only for a moment just looked into the Horror Section?

It is even more phenomenal for me to look at the particular actors and actresses and seen what their real accomplishments have been say, into the Arts, Business, Social Sciences, and Medicine.

The point that is trying to be made here is that Boris Karloff, Betty Davis, Robert England, Lon Chaney, Bela Lugosi and Vincent Price, are recognized as one of the true icons of horror cinema, and the actor most closely identified with the general public’s perception of the “monster” from the classic Mary Shelley book, “Frankenstein” is Boris Karloff.
The irony about these thespians is that they lived almost dual lives. Most of them achieved high statuses in other fields.

It is also quite well-known that many of today’s stars or celebrities got their original startsMV5BMzc3NjEwNTM1MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDU2NzI5NA@@__V1_UX128_CR0,0,128,190_AL_ in some form of horror or thriller film.

I know that there have been extremely bizarre debates as well as arguments that deal with the film’s rating which as I’m sure you are aware of that the more blood, female skin, graphics, and the like, the more the film must be edited to receive a “good housekeeping” rating.

This genre of film works tremendously in the United States. For reasons that are unbeknownst to me since many of the characters, stories, and scenes come from different cultures living mostly in Europe.

So what does all of this have to do with the U.S.A. and what the country is being made into? Actually, or for the most part, nothing. For anyone that argues I would say that the slasher films or horror films are definitely part of the American culture.

Actually what concerns me is that the USA is a Judeo-Christian based culture; I know that there are some that would love to argue this point — but so, so sorry. There is no argument.

MV5BMTM3NjA1NDMyMV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDQzNDMzOQ@@__V1_UY190_CR0,0,128,190_AL_People say that there are difficulties with guns — is it guns or is it people? Same thing with crime. Speaking of incarceration and the disparities’ that seem too lopsided and I will argue that people are either not looking at the truth or, our system of laws is being too manipulated or, legislation is certainly in the wrong hands. Why should we as a nation, leave the sentencing criteria up to the House or Senate or both? These people do not know sentencing because they are rich and privileged.

Finally if the law states that for a “Third Conviction” a person gets life imprisonment, then anyone disputing that claim should not call for a change in sentencing guidelines (that’s discrimination!) but rather should be challenging the guidelines. One way or another it is always going to come back to the person who committed the crime. Guns, drugs, murder, etc., if the penalty is strong enough without exceptions then the crimes will drop like bricks.

quill5

Just to Make Sure the President follows the Law

Just to Make Sure the President follows the Law

Lawmakers from both parties exchanged salvos Sunday over who should fill the Supreme Court seat vacated Saturday by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

After news of Scalia’s death, Senate Republicans quickly dug in, promising to block President Obama’s nominee to replace him.

Led by Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., they pledged to keep the high court seat open for the next president to fill in 2017.

But Democrats argue that, with more than 10 months left in office, it’s Obama’s constitutional prerogative to fill the seat even if it is an election year.

Not so fast to the liberal faction, we argue. According to the U.S. Constitution the President’s privilege to nominate a candidate for the position of Supreme Court justice is what is at stake. And according to Article II Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution for the ratification of the individual nominated it would take two-thirds of the Senate conferring for the nomination to be approved.

Interestingly I happened on polling data being collected by an agency representing the entire United States by cable television. Accordingly, the results of the poll that asked “Should President Obama wait until a new administration takes office in 2017” 93 percent of the people polled said “Yes” while those who opposed was 7 percent.

It is important to point out that this was a popular poll – one in which could not claim to be a scientific poll. However, this shows that 93 percent of the people favored President Obama waiting until a new administration was seated. This of course means that Obama would not be making a nomination insofar as his term in office would be over.

Many experts allege that this action would solidify a positive legacy for the president.

images

A Look at the Usurpation of Politics

Same Sex Marriage…A Look at the Usurpation of Politics

Now realistically…who did not see this coming? From the instant this entire matter started wearing that fancy “federal” title we knew it was only a matter of time before a decent, respecting, God-fearing state would see the monumentous problems this intrusion has made.
Attorneys for same-sex couples turned away from a marriage license office in Alabama asked a federal judge Tuesday to clarify that local officials must issue the permits.

Gay_Marriage_Alabama-0df69The legal action is the latest twist in a standoff with Alabama authorities defying a federal court ruling that cleared the way for same-sex marriages in the state.

The request on behalf of more than 10 couples came after a majority of probate judges in the state closed up shop Monday rather than issue the licenses.

Alabama joined 36 states and the District with legal same-sex marriage after a federal judge overturned the state’s ban. (For those figuring that’s a HUGE 74%).

On the day that same-sex unions became legal in Alabama, local officials in dozens of counties on Monday defied a federal judge’s decision and refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples, casting the state into judicial chaos.

Gay couples were able to get licenses in about a dozen places, including Birmingham, Huntsville and a few other counties where probate judges complied with the judge’s decision. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled early Monday that it would deny Alabama’s request to put the marriages on hold.

This action by the US Supreme Court is a step in maneuvering towards the goal of “Usurpation of politics” insofar as it rightly appears that the local, state, and Supreme Court’s of thirty seven states as well as the District of Columbia are not requisite with earlier decisions made by the federal government.

But in the majority of counties, officials said they would refuse to license same-sex marriages or stop providing licenses altogether, confronting couples — gay and heterosexual — with locked doors and shuttered windows.

Many of the state’s 68 probate judges mounted their resistance to the federal decision at the urging of the firebrand chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Roy Moore. He is best known for refusing more than a decade ago to comply with a court order to remove a monument to the Ten Commandments from the state Supreme Court’s offices.

But the probate judge in Mobile — scene of the most high-profile confrontation — has also asked for legal clarification from the Alabama Supreme Court in a counter move.

It was this court’s chief justice, Roy Moore, who had initially advised the probate judges not to give out the licenses.

“For now, we’re going to maintain the status quo,” the aide, Mark Erwin, told a crowd of about 20 people gathered at probate court.

Despite the chaos, hundreds of gay and lesbian Alabama couples managed to get marriage licenses Monday, activists said.

Some activists believe the state’s chief justice Moore also has intimidated probate judges. A letter late Sunday from Moore claimed probate judges could face reprimands from the governor if they issued same-sex marriage licenses.

pressheader

Obama Administration admitted to The New York Times they resisted producing a metric

Who could believe what this man says?

Who could believe what this man says?

In a stunning admission, officials in the Obama Administration admitted to The New York Times they resisted producing a metric to determine whether the border is secure because President Obama did not want any hurdles placed between illegal aliens and a pathway to citizenship (The New York Times, Mar. 21, 2013).

The admission was made to the New York Times Thursday, a day after Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials shocked Members of Congress by announcing that despite promises to develop one, they still have no official way to measure whether the border is secure. (Hearing video clip; Mar. 20, 2013)

In 2011, the Obama Administration abandoned the metric of “operational control” and it planned to develop a new “holistic” measure, called the Border Condition Index (BCI) to measure border security. Indeed, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano herself told Congress in October 2011 that this index would be able to provide “the big picture” for measuring progress at the border and that it would be ready the second quarter of Fiscal Year 2012. (Napolitano Testimony, Oct. 25, 2011; See FAIR Legislative Update, Mar. 4, 2013, for more background information.)

Upon learning the Obama Administration delayed developing a border security metric to protect a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens, the FAIR sharply criticized both the Administration and those in Congress who are trying to ram a mass amnesty bill through Congress.

“The American people need to understand that the current administration has no intention of honoring any enforcement commitments that might be included in an amnesty bill. Both the administration and leading lawmakers are making it clear that enforcement will either be delayed endlessly or ignored altogether,” said FAIR’s President Dan Stein.

“Moreover, how can Congress possibly consider passing mass amnesty legislation when the Department of Homeland Security admits it has no way of measuring whether the border is secure, and when Obama Administration officials say they don’t want one?” he concluded. (FAIR Press Release, Mar. 22, 2013) Hat-tip to Julie Kirchner at FAIR for inspiration.

 

 victorian_line