Would or could someone tell me what a U.S. Senator does?

Would or could someone tell me what a U.S. Senator does?

 I believe, with extraordinary support, that the “chamber” in this nation we refer to as the Senate is a worthless group of people who have sold their bill of goods to someone who actually bought them.  So, please join in with me and assist me even more with what it is exactly that this “chamber” of people do for you, the nation, or for anything or anyone.

Trying to be as diligent as possible, yet at the same time wanting to be as gentle and straight forward as I can be, I will openly admit that I have been around a few years. I certainly am not saying that I am old – because I am not. If I look at the scriptures to come to a reasonable figure pursuant to my own age – I would say that I have acquired wisdom, and that feature is based on what I have learned, and by far the most important ingredient that unites the three-fold accumulation of age – scripturally – is found in the ability to discern the understanding.

And this notion or idea my friends is where the obstacle or obstruction gave that “chamber” that is so coveted in our nation. Frankly, I believed the entire process of becoming a U.S. sitting Senator, is literally an amount of bull squat that one promises and hopes to accomplish. I certainly do not want to think that I live in this kind of a mess, but the reality is, that I do.

My own personal belief is that the selling process (for the vote), in order to become a senator, lies with the relationship that a person has with their local government. This is where the most fundamental promise can be dreamt up and delivered to an ever-so-hungry person. Special favors as in cash and other sundries along with pork or money can be made for the promise of bridge building, road maintenance, and other amenities delivered to the community. I firmly believe that promises within the failing educational system are made. Therefore, as it may be if a senator is able to siphon off enough funding for in and around “their” constituency, well, far more the better.

Moreover, now let’s address the big-time office space that holds the lobbyists and special interest groups. Not many people are privy to the notion that the National Council of La Raza, the largest group of individuals pushing for Immigration Reform like the normal person asks for salvation. Most people do not know that La Raza receives funding from the U.S. government for alleging to assist immigrants. Notice, that I say immigrants and not illegal immigrants! First by their filing with the IRS having to do with a not for profit status entity, as well as petitioning the government for more funding pursuant to what they allege that their organization does.

Now then, what do you suppose a U.S. Senator or House Representative receives if they are successful in fundraising (sort of off the books) for a special interest group? Hum.

Now what has gotten me to a spill the beans attitude nowadays is this, how does an organization with an 8 percent approval rating even get invited to dinner by the organization?  Now I openly share with you that I personally have been promised a wall to assist our border patrol for in excess of 20 years to keep it within reality – basically since 1996. And although I have paid my fair share for that wall, it still isn’t there. Facial recognition apparatus? Another unfulfilled promise. These U.S. “Senators” have waffled back and forth on integrating the E-Verify program, as well as the community assistance between local law enforcement with federal agency back-up, support, and assistance referred to as Section 287g federal assistance.

Take the fundamental learning of what has not been done that was supposed to, Section 287g, E-Verify programs, biological recognition programs, ending rather than accumulating more visas, and simply understanding that this is entirely a close held joking secret that their make untold scores of money on, and just let your wisdom run with this one gang – we are being taken by an eight percent approval rating group of misfits with fat double chins and hanging joules making their insider trading money and on, and on, ad nauseam.

Arden V

Advertisements

Visas, Immigration, Illegal Immigration, Population Control, Wars, Religions, and Discrimination

Visas, Immigration, Illegal Immigration, Population Control, Wars, Religions, and Discrimination

As faimagesCAJK81ZEr as we see it – “it” being the operative word for the conditions currently going on in the United States – and seriously asking ourselves, “How good for us is all the squabbling.”  I’m not the first person to wonder about the rubbish we, as a nation, have gotten ourselves into; however, I would like to be ahead in the line of who it is that is trying with due-diligence to stop and get out of” it.”

And I will openly admit that I feel that the mainstream media has a firm foothold on how public policy and how American awareness feels about it. Therefore please, allow me to ask you a question and just hopefully we’ll get some responses to this question: “America is in trouble, what we can do to help our current government end this trouble?”

Just some fundamentals for us. Should the government (for whatever reason) continue to have a free give away Diversity Lottery on visas for 80,000 or more people per year?

In this article, it should be made known that at least 50% of all legal immigrants coming to America are awarded entitlements as at their arrival? What does good moral character mean? Do you feel as though so kind of legislation should be made prohibiting these individuals from gaining access to the USA?

And this entire notion of while a person is here in the USA while visiting from Russia, Iran, or Mexico, or anywhere for that matter, who goes into labor gives birth and WHAM! They have got a US citizen in their hands, which in turn makes every member of that child’s family or extended family worthy of receiving entitlements? Is that fair?

Now as for Senator’s: Schumer, Rubio, Graham, McCain, Flake, Durbin, Menendez, and Bennett commonly referred to as The Gang of Eight collectively these 8 senators wrote the first draft of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013, commonly known as “the immigration bill.” As we already know, the House didn’t even look at the Bill so it was basically debunked on release. Did the USA need another Sub-Committee?

scalesDo we need to reevaluate the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 to regain control of our country? Currently, that act is viewed by most not as lifting the limits of immigrants from certain countries as much as with the Kennedy backing it is viewed now to be an act of civil rights legislation and those rights for potential immigrants. From the act itself”

  • It created a seven-category preference system, which gave priority to relatives of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents and to professionals and other individuals with specialized skills.
  • Immediate relatives and “special immigrants” were not subject to numerical restrictions. Some of the “special immigrants” include ministers, former employees of the U.S. government, foreign medical graduates, among others.
  • It added a labor certification requirement, which dictated that the Secretary of Labor needed to certify labor shortages.
  • Refugees were given the seventh and last category preference with the possibility of adjusting their status. However, refugees could enter the United States through other means as well like those seeking temporary asylum. How much has this notion changed?

Even if America is the land of opportunity why do politicians feel it’s necessary to spread that opportunity immediately?

CLOUD finger-illusionsDid you understand what the leader of Iraq meant when he stated, “Death to America and Israel”? Why is it so important to give visas to people who disagree with our way of life? This is confusing to me. “Let their blood run down the streets” is something we hear, beheading innocent individuals is just another thing we see. How long will it be until America shows the fortitude it once had?

Arden V

Responsible People wait on Evidence

Responsible People wait on Evidence

lighted crossOkay, okay now — Let’s not all get bent and twisted with regards to these two apparent shots fired by the St. Paul, MN police officers and the Baton Rouge, LA police officers until we know the legitimate facts that will be found out.

What I am trying to espouse here is that there may be far more that has happened and I am just suggesting that we try to be accountable citizens regarding the facts as they emerge.

Please let us all be responsible people — unlike those St. Louis Rams individuals who took a NFL field in protest with their hands fully raised up, or anything like Messrs. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others during the Trayvon Martin investigation or taking it back a bit further, those same men at the Duke University La Cross team fiasco, that ended up costing a District Attorney his license to practice law, not to mention his job.

Recognizing the extreme fortune of a well pronounced investigation, let’s not jump to conclusions as did the Rams players, Beyonce, the USAG Loretta Lynch, as well as former USAG Eric Holder did before her in re: Michael Brown’s case. And now just as he proclaimed that Trayvon Martin is what his son would look like, President Barack Hussein Obama has gotten involved from the White House via Poland!

I am a civil rights movement participant just as Diana was, whereby “she was part of the Kingcivil rights movement that protested against discrimination” according to a BBC reporter, in St. Paul MN.

In St. Paul, Philando Castile’s death appears to be equally as difficult to jump to a simple conclusion.

The same with Alton Sterling, a 37-year-old father of five, was killed on Tuesday at a Baton Rouge LA convenience store.

First let’s have a look at confiscated evidence in the two cases. Philando Castile was involved in a traffic stop for a broken tail light. It was only after:

Philando Castile informed the officers on scene that he had a Concealed Carry permit and was in possession of a gun that the officers stated to him to stop looking for his license and registration when apparently Castile produced a gun and was hot in the arm.

In the matter of Alton Sterling, everyone should be advised that the police officers were responding to a Dispatcher’s directive stating, A man had been harassing a child with a gun prior to the complainant calling the police. As the police responded they told Mr. Sterling not to go into his pants (pockets) and while he Sterling was fiddling around in his trousers,

Police wrestled Sterling to the ground. However it has been reported that a witness said, “he saw officers take a gun from Mr. Sterling’s pocket after the shooting,” but police have not commented on this.

Unlike others albeit celebrities, other make-shift law enforcement officers, civil rights clans-people or professional athletes or lying politicians let’s be the responsible one’s. Let’s wait until the investigations are thoroughly complete before we make a sound.

Arden V

The media…is it fair?

CcmKujIWEAAScEQPlease let’s not all go battsh!t at once! Within the last obnoxious seven plus years the media has been so bad that new names have been accredited to it. How about the mainstream media? The drive by media? How about the lying media? Or simply just the overwhelming misrepresenting media or the misleading media?

Today I was at my Twitter account (public) to answer questions and the like insofar as I have some AWESOME followers at the site. And these people deserve an answers to their questions. So humbly I try.

That is when I noticed a question from a New York Times reporter that wiggles her way into the current campaign. Get this one: 3 million fewer Democrats have voted in the first 15 states compared to 2008, while the GOP turnout has surged. What role has media played in fueling GOP turnout, tamping down Dems’? Signs of Turnout Trouble.

As for me gang, I almost puked right on the spot! Consider if you will how CNN got its name as the Clinton News Network. Furthermore, let’s just look at the 2008 debate between Romney and Obama where Romney made tremendous strides in the need for a smaller government, tax rates, and the immigration problem. So in fact, much to the chagrin of those listening and watching the esteemed moderator cut him off!

Then when Obama in fact was misrepresenting the costs turned into taxes or subsidies she let him continue until Obama outright lied for the 20th something time when he again made law without conferring with Congress.

So, so sorry friends I am just flabbergasted right now. Lord knows that we try and use journalistic integrity here but when matters get so fouled up then it is my service to say something about it. Here are some of the collective responses:
• From a employee at MSMBC — Even MSNBC covered long stretches of his speeches
• From Politico — Donald Trump’s campaign reached out to Speaker Paul Ryan’s operation to chat
• From the NYT They have stirred the pot for sure! Trump got tons of free media for 6 months! But GOP will help: party crumbling & SCOTUS
• Media gave Trump a free platform & now he has emerged as a 21st century Birth of a Nation (Politico)

This is typical liberal bull squat! It certainly was not the media who cherished the notion that at least 17 GOP members along with many debates to cover. As I understand liberals they form (somehow) into these elitist individuals and through their blame and discontent cry, beg, filibuster, ad nauseumuntil the right leaning people just give in.

victorian_line

What is America Being Made Into..?

What is America Being Made Into..?

MV5BOTA2NjI3ODExNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjU3OTE5MDE@__V1_UY190_CR8,0,128,190_AL_Interestingly we have all watched the horror movies since the beginning of our very lives! When was the last time you or anyone you know gone to the Internet Movie Database (imdb) and if only for a moment just looked into the Horror Section?

It is even more phenomenal for me to look at the particular actors and actresses and seen what their real accomplishments have been say, into the Arts, Business, Social Sciences, and Medicine.

The point that is trying to be made here is that Boris Karloff, Betty Davis, Robert England, Lon Chaney, Bela Lugosi and Vincent Price, are recognized as one of the true icons of horror cinema, and the actor most closely identified with the general public’s perception of the “monster” from the classic Mary Shelley book, “Frankenstein” is Boris Karloff.
The irony about these thespians is that they lived almost dual lives. Most of them achieved high statuses in other fields.

It is also quite well-known that many of today’s stars or celebrities got their original startsMV5BMzc3NjEwNTM1MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDU2NzI5NA@@__V1_UX128_CR0,0,128,190_AL_ in some form of horror or thriller film.

I know that there have been extremely bizarre debates as well as arguments that deal with the film’s rating which as I’m sure you are aware of that the more blood, female skin, graphics, and the like, the more the film must be edited to receive a “good housekeeping” rating.

This genre of film works tremendously in the United States. For reasons that are unbeknownst to me since many of the characters, stories, and scenes come from different cultures living mostly in Europe.

So what does all of this have to do with the U.S.A. and what the country is being made into? Actually, or for the most part, nothing. For anyone that argues I would say that the slasher films or horror films are definitely part of the American culture.

Actually what concerns me is that the USA is a Judeo-Christian based culture; I know that there are some that would love to argue this point — but so, so sorry. There is no argument.

MV5BMTM3NjA1NDMyMV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDQzNDMzOQ@@__V1_UY190_CR0,0,128,190_AL_People say that there are difficulties with guns — is it guns or is it people? Same thing with crime. Speaking of incarceration and the disparities’ that seem too lopsided and I will argue that people are either not looking at the truth or, our system of laws is being too manipulated or, legislation is certainly in the wrong hands. Why should we as a nation, leave the sentencing criteria up to the House or Senate or both? These people do not know sentencing because they are rich and privileged.

Finally if the law states that for a “Third Conviction” a person gets life imprisonment, then anyone disputing that claim should not call for a change in sentencing guidelines (that’s discrimination!) but rather should be challenging the guidelines. One way or another it is always going to come back to the person who committed the crime. Guns, drugs, murder, etc., if the penalty is strong enough without exceptions then the crimes will drop like bricks.

quill5

Just to Make Sure the President follows the Law

Just to Make Sure the President follows the Law

Lawmakers from both parties exchanged salvos Sunday over who should fill the Supreme Court seat vacated Saturday by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

After news of Scalia’s death, Senate Republicans quickly dug in, promising to block President Obama’s nominee to replace him.

Led by Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., they pledged to keep the high court seat open for the next president to fill in 2017.

But Democrats argue that, with more than 10 months left in office, it’s Obama’s constitutional prerogative to fill the seat even if it is an election year.

Not so fast to the liberal faction, we argue. According to the U.S. Constitution the President’s privilege to nominate a candidate for the position of Supreme Court justice is what is at stake. And according to Article II Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution for the ratification of the individual nominated it would take two-thirds of the Senate conferring for the nomination to be approved.

Interestingly I happened on polling data being collected by an agency representing the entire United States by cable television. Accordingly, the results of the poll that asked “Should President Obama wait until a new administration takes office in 2017” 93 percent of the people polled said “Yes” while those who opposed was 7 percent.

It is important to point out that this was a popular poll – one in which could not claim to be a scientific poll. However, this shows that 93 percent of the people favored President Obama waiting until a new administration was seated. This of course means that Obama would not be making a nomination insofar as his term in office would be over.

Many experts allege that this action would solidify a positive legacy for the president.

images

Saying something about this situation, for Tom Brady

bradyAll up, even the professional writings I have done, I feel the need to at least saying something about this situation. This is an ongoing “bitch back” for all of those pundits, people in sports who write without critically thinking first, yet most of all, it is for those mental midgets we have in society who make an assessment without consulting the supporting documentation, which simply is the precise same thing as ruining a person’s civil liberties. Okay then — fast, lean and mean — with this I make mention of the NFL and Tom Brady.

You see, Mr. Brady was insulted and unadulteratedly made a fall guy for something that [all things being equal] he according to his own civil rights, as well as the law of our land has been accused of without any proof of a crime and is allegedly supposed to be suspended for at least four games. Like it or not, every individual who offers a debate should at the very least be informed. Actually I want to kindly offer “get informed!” Unbeknownst to many people a team of seven NFL lawyers and supposedly the best forensics teams available gathered to investigate Mr. Brady’s actions with the actual amount of air resident in a football.

Up to the minute of this writing this so called lawyer group — proffered an item referred to as “The Wells Report” measuring some 243 pages in length all of which could not and admittedly so, found the Mr. Brady simply did not have anything to do with the deflated footballs used within the first quarter and a half of a football game he participated in. The report concluded that it was “more probable than not that Brady was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities.”

So given all of the amassed education doing the investigation (7 lawyers & a Forensics Team) not one single piece of scalesincriminating evidence was found to inflict charges against Tom Brady. What kind of summation is “more probable than not that Brady was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities.” Again, based on what? In order to inflict a punishment on Brady the ever-so-implicated-in stealing, Roger Goodell, Commissioner of the NFL saw to it that he was the arbitrating officer at the arbitration phase. All things being equal here gang is that we are putting a sports icon on trial for something that there are no facts, evidence or bad-will to even consider.

barackoNow for my close here gang, I want to say for the record the truth about our society is that we have a president who constantly violates the US Constitution, then laughs. We also have a former secretary of state who has lied her ass off and been caught doing so; moreover, the depth of her lies have literally cost several people their very lives. Did I mention that in our society the total of some nine hundred thousand dollars plus, was fraudulently gained by those folks in congress who were writing bad checks? In this society most people feel as though it is okay to harvest and sell unborn human baby parts, before the abortion is even performed. Tell me anything about where you live.

storyend_dingbat