President Obama 10 days before

coc_2It took former President Obama 10 days from leaving the White House before he spoke out against President Trump’s order to temporarily ban people from seven predominately Muslim countries.

The statement was from a spokesman, and it did not attack Trump directly. Rather it appealed to protesters.

“President Obama is heartened by the level of engagement taking place in communities around the country,” Kevin Lewis, a spokesman for the former president, said in a statement. “Citizens exercising their constitutional right to assemble, organize and have their voices heard by their elected officials is exactly what we expect to see when American values are at stake.”

It is overly easy to tell that this is Democrat Party writing. Leveling the details: Barack Obama is “heartened by the level of engagement” around the nation. Here is where this gets just a little bullish: “Citizens exercising their constitutional right to assemble, organize and have their voices…see when American values are at stake.”     CcmKujIWEAAScEQ

As for me, this was written for the child-like mind insofar as it reeks of how democrats are constantly changing the wording, the truth, lying, and prone to changing a subject whenever they are wrong. Example: What Obama and this individual are doing to “American values” is simply incorrect. He conveniently leaves out the right to peaceably assemble, moreover, to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I was taught that “to petition” openly means that anyone assembling needs to have a signed permit or petition listing where, when, how, and why the “redress of grievances” would be taking place. Indeed back in the 1970s, any self-respecting protester would apply for a petition first.

There is a debate on how to approach a Trump attack. There is fear that if Obama comes out too early against Trump it could lessen the effectiveness of the message. His team reportedly does not want Obama to be the face of the anti-Trump protests.

“I wouldn’t be opposed if he spoke out,” Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., told Politico. “I just don’t know what effect it would be.” If any! Nothing quite like a person who is largely responsible for the continued heartened by the level of engagement of Ferguson, Missouri, and all the other places that Obama inspired racial animus.

He continued, “In hindsight, I believe it was wrong for Barack Obama to normalize Donald Trump,” he said.

LiarsPolls show Obama left the office both popular and trusted. (What! You must be joking!)He had appeared more cautious about diluting his influence by quickly second-guessing Trump. Doing so could make it easier for Trump to dismiss critiques as predictable partisan nitpicking. And becoming the face of Trump’s opposition could make it harder for the next generation of Democratic leaders to emerge.

Obama said nothing Monday when Trump fired his former appointee Sally Yates, who was serving as acting attorney general. He also won’t opine on Trump’s announcement of a Supreme Court nominee, former White House aides in touch with Obama said. This is sympathetic. Yates should have been fired. Obama should have been impeached.

Obama loyalists said the expressions of opposition aren’t part of an organized campaign. They reported being energized by a series of group text messages, Facebook groups and email chains in which some of the thousands of one-time Obama staffers are sharing their dismay. Then do us all a favor and quit.

What is so hard about allowing the elected President do his job? We all know that it is petty and very, very Democratic Party nonsense that is causing the gridlock, better still, the Monster Truck pile up on the beltway.

bot-flourish

Whew! I found this to be an Interesting Thought…

Whew! I found this to be an Interesting Thought…

68b3a361d9136bb4d1d858e85765e2289f754d89_jpg_cf“What, only Republican presidents get to nominate judges? Is that in the Constitution? I used to teach constitutional law. I’ve never seen that provision” —  President Barack Obama, in remarks given yesterday at a rally for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in North Carolina.

But wait! There is more — President Obama went on to chide Republican senators for their stance on blocking all future Supreme Court nominations if Clinton wins the presidency, saying, “[T]he reason they said they wouldn’t have a hearing or vote for my Supreme Court nominee, bucking all of American history, was because, ‘We thought the American people should decide the next Supreme Court justice.’ Now they’re saying, ‘Well, if they don’t decide the way we want them to decide, maybe we won’t even do that.’ Eleven years ago, Richard Burr said a Supreme Court without nine justices would not work. Well, what changed?” Senator Burr recently vowed to keep any of Clinton’s Supreme Court nominees from being confirmed. 

However, I do think that Barack Hussein Obama, President, Nah, Cheerleader for Hillary Clinton and bonafide hater of Donald Trump. Upon hearing the bountiful mouth of Cheerleader Barack Obama in both North Carolina and Florida. I am positive that somewhere between Obama’s Justice Department and the Oval Office I’d face arrest charges even if it were telling the truth about this asinine clown.

“[T]he reason they said they wouldn’t have a hearing or vote for my Supreme Court nominee, bucking all of American history,” let’s be telling the truth here Mr. Cheerleader, the entire population of this great nation (with the exception of a few!) voted you in as the first African American president not once but twice pandering to your lies, misrepresentations, and utter bull squat.

arden B

Please everyone who reads this post, please fire a letter, email, or fax to Roger Goodell

story

Are we being Sold Out?

Before we all make tremendous fools out of ourselves, let’s look with interest like the privileged sophisticated people we are and with just a little perseverance we may find out the matters to every one of our questions.

Please let us all be responsible people — unlike those St. Louis Rams individuals who took a NFL field in protest with their hands fully raised up, or anything like Messrs. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others during the Trayvon Martin investigation or taking it back a bit further, those same men at the Duke University La Cross team fiasco, that ended up costing a District Attorney his license to practice law, not to mention his job.

People when we all want something and I sure do, then let’s take the time to prepare for what it is we may find out. Example: As in the paragraph above I mentioned – unlike those St. Louis Rams individuals who took a NFL field in protest over the untimely and significantly unfortunate death of Michael Brown.

Currently I am asking Roger Goodell the Superintendent in charge of the NFL how and why is it that these individuals can be such a bad influence on the community at large; moreover, with millions of fans watching them they script a hogwash message and nothing was said. I am certain that the Black Lives Matter organization has something to say about this fiasco of an incident.

Now if you don’t mind why such a hard unrelenting penalty against a man who can prove, as he has done so many times over that he did not do anything to the footballs during the AFC Championship game between the New England Patriots and the Indianapolis Colts?

As for my integrity (take a queue Roger Goodell) how can a man be convicted, fined, and be faced with millions in legal fees – now that only happens inside of Washington DC, right Hillary Clinton?

I need to say this — it certainly seems as though everyone has got a mouth; rather, they use their mouths to further show what huge asses they and their big mouths are.
Please everyone who reads this post, please fire a letter, email, or fax to Roger Goodell the guy only made like $43 million last year and for what?

Arden V

President Obama: A Reflective Letter

President Obama: A Reflective Letter

To the glorification of the one, POTUS, Barack Obama:

Dear President Barack Hussein Obama:

map of cuban citiesPlease undertake the mission of understanding this letter. After years, months, weeks, days and whenever I was able to dedicate to those “things” that weigh us down heavily, then through a process of critically making myself aware of the effect, existence, or character of something else and therefore having the ability to see outright the truth of matters that collect upon you, Sir, I wonder if three issues that have been committed by you have been perceived and accepted by you, and if so, I am in wondrous anticipation of what you have said to your daughter’s about the two issues.

Of the first issue — which in my mind is significantly important: How were you able to travel to Cuba and while there fit in a trip to watch a baseball game and do a wave to show your support even though you knew that the terroristic act had taken place in Brussels?

How can the leader of the nation that so many are counting on for help albeit, militarily, financially, refugee status, or for food and shelter, enjoy himself with matters that mean so very little to the entire American population?

carnage in brusselsThen immediately following your recreation time in Cuba, you managed to tango with a voluptuous lady again with further knowledge of what had happened in the blood riddled, bomb bashing, and unfortunately deaths and injuries to those who are in need?

Of my last issue here — within this public letter to you — please understand that I have written to you at the White House, the Oval Office, and to the head custodian hoping to receive something, anything back from you however, to no avail.

Therefore, I ask humbly and filled with modesty about this unfortunate disaster that is happening in our beloved country. I am overly concerned as to why you have never ask my position on matters relative to illegal immigration, runaway visas, the amount of visa overstays especially in colleges and universities from those whom you esteem as the USA’s most prominent resources that of course being foreign students.

Why didn’t you fly back to at least the United States during the unforeseen massacre in Brussels? Sir I believe that this is a civil letter that needs a response by you. Thanking you in advance I remain (one who choose civility),

Yours with regret,

Jon-Paul A. Schilling, ESQ.

pressheader

The media…is it fair?

CcmKujIWEAAScEQPlease let’s not all go battsh!t at once! Within the last obnoxious seven plus years the media has been so bad that new names have been accredited to it. How about the mainstream media? The drive by media? How about the lying media? Or simply just the overwhelming misrepresenting media or the misleading media?

Today I was at my Twitter account (public) to answer questions and the like insofar as I have some AWESOME followers at the site. And these people deserve an answers to their questions. So humbly I try.

That is when I noticed a question from a New York Times reporter that wiggles her way into the current campaign. Get this one: 3 million fewer Democrats have voted in the first 15 states compared to 2008, while the GOP turnout has surged. What role has media played in fueling GOP turnout, tamping down Dems’? Signs of Turnout Trouble.

As for me gang, I almost puked right on the spot! Consider if you will how CNN got its name as the Clinton News Network. Furthermore, let’s just look at the 2008 debate between Romney and Obama where Romney made tremendous strides in the need for a smaller government, tax rates, and the immigration problem. So in fact, much to the chagrin of those listening and watching the esteemed moderator cut him off!

Then when Obama in fact was misrepresenting the costs turned into taxes or subsidies she let him continue until Obama outright lied for the 20th something time when he again made law without conferring with Congress.

So, so sorry friends I am just flabbergasted right now. Lord knows that we try and use journalistic integrity here but when matters get so fouled up then it is my service to say something about it. Here are some of the collective responses:
• From a employee at MSMBC — Even MSNBC covered long stretches of his speeches
• From Politico — Donald Trump’s campaign reached out to Speaker Paul Ryan’s operation to chat
• From the NYT They have stirred the pot for sure! Trump got tons of free media for 6 months! But GOP will help: party crumbling & SCOTUS
• Media gave Trump a free platform & now he has emerged as a 21st century Birth of a Nation (Politico)

This is typical liberal bull squat! It certainly was not the media who cherished the notion that at least 17 GOP members along with many debates to cover. As I understand liberals they form (somehow) into these elitist individuals and through their blame and discontent cry, beg, filibuster, ad nauseumuntil the right leaning people just give in.

victorian_line

Greta Van Susteren inspires with “Why don’t we try something new?”

Greta Van Susteren inspires with “Why don’t we try something new?”

Whilst reading last evening I make it a point to happen across other influential person’s writings and I must admit that Greta van Susteren’s article on her site, posted onto Face Book did precisely what the doctor ordered.

eagle4Greta writes, “The nation is – or at least it seems so to me – terribly divided. Everyone has picked a group – whether it be by gender or ethnic background, etc. – and placed a stake in the ground. When this happens, people divide, not unite. This is taking sides, not joining together and you know what happens when people just take sides.”

Continuing she says, “Why don’t we go back to the old concept of America being a melting pot and all of us being Americans with first emphasis being on common goals.

I wrote at pretty good length an (hopefully) inspiring response that having sat on it for about 18 hours I would like to share with you and again, hopefully, get some response.

I do not think Greta is in error whatsoever with her feelings. The fact has it that the American mind-set has changed and primarily so with visitors, students, as well as illegal immigrants just making plans to sojourn to America for a spell.

0930-cittest_thumbnail_288_croppedFor the last 150 years or so, to be an immigrant with citizenship aspirations one needed to aspire to assimilate in every American way possible. Let’s say that 100 or more years ago, acquiring written and spoken English skills was not a problem. At all —

One specific issue is that people come to America now – not for the sake of the Nation – yet rather for the life styles and standards of living for their children and relatives that supersede their own. You see, it is not for the Nation that they come, rather, it is for what they can take from the country.

And I will point a finger of blame here, or what is mentioned as attribution. Years ago our wretched Congress as well as other branches within the federal government thought it overly wise to liberalize America. By this what I mean is the unadulterated inclusion of every sojourner’s wants and needs. Although fact has it that these people did not earn their keep.

As long as special interest groups AND American rights and privileges could be bestowed upon these people,flageag9 what on earth was different? Therefore the mentality of these individuals grabbed those special interest groups. Then it is logical that sojourner’s would also lobby or protest congressional officials and in most cases – those who had the least power – special interests within unions, universities, colleges, and school districts in order to make them feel as though they did.

I find that there is a critical piece of this situation missing. Several actually… Pride in yourself as well as country; achieving the American Way or The Great American Dream, takes giving it all away…meaning give one’s self away for the great Nation that one is making.

This my friends is where America is suffering. Some or most say it is coming from the White House. Others say it is from a bunch of idealistic congress people. One must remember that when everyone assimilates, then there is NOT groups or otherwise divide.

victorian_line

Saying something about this situation, for Tom Brady

bradyAll up, even the professional writings I have done, I feel the need to at least saying something about this situation. This is an ongoing “bitch back” for all of those pundits, people in sports who write without critically thinking first, yet most of all, it is for those mental midgets we have in society who make an assessment without consulting the supporting documentation, which simply is the precise same thing as ruining a person’s civil liberties. Okay then — fast, lean and mean — with this I make mention of the NFL and Tom Brady.

You see, Mr. Brady was insulted and unadulteratedly made a fall guy for something that [all things being equal] he according to his own civil rights, as well as the law of our land has been accused of without any proof of a crime and is allegedly supposed to be suspended for at least four games. Like it or not, every individual who offers a debate should at the very least be informed. Actually I want to kindly offer “get informed!” Unbeknownst to many people a team of seven NFL lawyers and supposedly the best forensics teams available gathered to investigate Mr. Brady’s actions with the actual amount of air resident in a football.

Up to the minute of this writing this so called lawyer group — proffered an item referred to as “The Wells Report” measuring some 243 pages in length all of which could not and admittedly so, found the Mr. Brady simply did not have anything to do with the deflated footballs used within the first quarter and a half of a football game he participated in. The report concluded that it was “more probable than not that Brady was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities.”

So given all of the amassed education doing the investigation (7 lawyers & a Forensics Team) not one single piece of scalesincriminating evidence was found to inflict charges against Tom Brady. What kind of summation is “more probable than not that Brady was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities.” Again, based on what? In order to inflict a punishment on Brady the ever-so-implicated-in stealing, Roger Goodell, Commissioner of the NFL saw to it that he was the arbitrating officer at the arbitration phase. All things being equal here gang is that we are putting a sports icon on trial for something that there are no facts, evidence or bad-will to even consider.

barackoNow for my close here gang, I want to say for the record the truth about our society is that we have a president who constantly violates the US Constitution, then laughs. We also have a former secretary of state who has lied her ass off and been caught doing so; moreover, the depth of her lies have literally cost several people their very lives. Did I mention that in our society the total of some nine hundred thousand dollars plus, was fraudulently gained by those folks in congress who were writing bad checks? In this society most people feel as though it is okay to harvest and sell unborn human baby parts, before the abortion is even performed. Tell me anything about where you live.

storyend_dingbat