Michelle Obama: Election About ‘Who Will Have the Power to Shape Our Children’

Michelle Obama: Election About ‘Who Will Have the Power to Shape Our Children’

michelleIf anyone did not miss the majority of the Republican National Convention RNC, seriously now, who on earth could be more proud of Mr. Trump’s adult offspring?

Sure I thought it was a little dicey having each one of the Trump clan taking such powerful speaking engagements; however, for me and most of my colleagues were in particular agreement at how well polished, strongly spoken, as well as impeccable adult children that each of Mr. Trump’s children are.

First lady Michelle Obama argued that Donald Trump is no example for America’s children during an impassioned pitch for Hillary Clinton’s candidacy at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia on Monday evening.

Well she has indeed proved that she is no smarter than her lying and nontransparent husband is outright.

Obama threw her support behind Hillary, noting “there were plenty of moments when Hillary could have decided that this work was too hard, that the price of public service was too high, that she was tired of being picked apart for how she looks or how she talks or even how she laughs.”

“But here’s the thing. What I admire most about Hillary is that she never buckles under pressure. She never takes the easy way out. And Hillary Clinton has never quit on anything in her life,” she continued. “And when I think about the kind of president that I want for my girls and all our children, that’s what I want.”

Right here with the above statement is what conjures up such discontent inside of me toward these people. Hillary Clinton has shown me as a professional person that she is a masterful liar. That is her easy way out. So please Mrs. Obama, what’s your excuse for Hillary moving on without Bill in their marriage?  1500px-DesertStormMap_v2_svg

Obama reflected on “the story of this country, the story that has brought me to this stage tonight, the story of generations of people who felt the lash of bondage, the shame of servitude, the sting of segregation, but who kept on striving and hoping and doing what needed to be done so that today I wake up every morning in a house that was built by slaves.”

There we go — for what’s it worth, we will never, ever be able to heal from what a small proportion of America’s earliest agrarians have done. And as long as this crap happens we never ever will.

James_Madison_140x190The first lady said she wants “a president who will teach our children that everyone in this country matters, a president who truly believes in the vision that our Founders put forth all those years ago that we are all created equal, each a beloved part of the great American story.”

Lady, you certainly need to put more emphasis into my column. Although you single handedly ignored everything that was written yesterday – which certainly allows me to know where your knowledge level is, however, just a quick question: Do you and what’s his name Barack, Berry or Whatever communicate?

arden B


A federal judge in Texas

A federal judge in Texas has threatened to hold Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and other top immigration Gavel resizedenforcement officials in contempt of court for not fixing problems that led to work permits being mistakenly awarded under President Barack Obama’s executive immigration action after the judge had put the plan on hold.

The Justice Department had said about 2,000 individuals had been sent three-year work authorizations after U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen in Brownsville, Texas, temporarily blocked the immigration action on Feb. 16.

In a court order Tuesday, Hanen said government officials have yet to fix the problem. The judge also requested Johnson and four other officials attend an Aug. 19 hearing to explain why the issue hasn’t been fixed and to “be prepared to show why he or she should not be held in contempt of court.”

“This court has expressed its willingness to believe that these actions were accidental and not done purposefully to violate this court’s order. Nevertheless, it is shocked and surprised at the cavalier attitude the government has taken with regard to its ‘efforts’ to rectify this situation,” Hanen wrote.

The other officials are: R. Gil Kerlikowske, commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Ronald Vitiello, deputy chief of the U.S. Border Patrol; Sarah Saldaña, director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and Leon Rodriguez, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

dhs sealHomeland Security spokeswoman Marsha Catron said in an email her agency and the Justice Department are reviewing Hanen’s order. Justice Department spokesman Patrick Rodenbush declined to comment.

In court documents filed in May, Rodríguez had said his agency had implemented “immediate corrective measures,” including revoking the permits and modifying computer systems to prevent issuing such permits in the future.

Hanen said in his order that if the federal government fixes the problem by July 31, he will cancel the Aug. 19 hearing.

Obama proposed in November expanding a program that protects young immigrants from deportation if they were brought to the U.S. illegally as children and adding another that extends deportation protections to parents of U.S. citizens and permanent residents who have been in the country for some years.

He said lack of action by Congress forced him to make sweeping changes to immigration rules on his own, but Republicans said Obama overstepped his authority. (Typical!)

The judge had issued the injunction at the request of a coalition of 26 states, led by Texas, which have filed a lawsuit to stop Obama’s action, saying it is unconstitutional. An appeal of Hanen’s ruling is set to be argued Friday before the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

Hanen has previously criticized the federal government’s actions in the lawsuit, saying the government had been “misleading” after officials revealed that more than 108,000 people had already received three-year reprieves from deportation as well as work permits when the judge had believed that no action would be taken before he issued a ruling on the injunction.

Justice Department attorneys apologized for any confusion regarding the 108,000 reprieves but insisted they were granted under a 2012 program that wasn’t affected by the injunction.

So which is it — on the one part we have a decent judge doing his job for the people; yet, on the other hand we have the Justice Department changing, altering, and furthermore making up rules and laws to deflect this judge’s intentions. This kind of activity by the Justice Department has been going on for years — accordingly it was once upheld because of the famous “Hoover ruling.” However, the bad news now is that there is evidence that every department in the US Federal government is sliding in one way or another.

Allow me please, why do you think the nation has been hit with so many “cyber-attacks” in recent weeks and months? When the group of cyber-attackers gets a whiff that a nation’s National Security Agency is checking and datamining sensitive material; moreover, when the group of cyber-attackers gets certified means that the former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, did not tell the truth regarding her independent servers were nestled in her home somehow doing “charitable work” when in reality she is breaking United States law, breaching everything from National security, opening up highways of encrypted data sources, top secret information, to any predator or largest bidder involved. What do you think is going on?

And now primarily because of these actions, the largest data-mining companies such as Google, Twitter, Facebook, and all the rest are setting their feet down with the Washington elite — or Washington’s white collar criminals.

Along with Texas, the states seeking to block Obama’s action are: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin


A Look at the Usurpation of Politics

Same Sex Marriage…A Look at the Usurpation of Politics

Now realistically…who did not see this coming? From the instant this entire matter started wearing that fancy “federal” title we knew it was only a matter of time before a decent, respecting, God-fearing state would see the monumentous problems this intrusion has made.
Attorneys for same-sex couples turned away from a marriage license office in Alabama asked a federal judge Tuesday to clarify that local officials must issue the permits.

Gay_Marriage_Alabama-0df69The legal action is the latest twist in a standoff with Alabama authorities defying a federal court ruling that cleared the way for same-sex marriages in the state.

The request on behalf of more than 10 couples came after a majority of probate judges in the state closed up shop Monday rather than issue the licenses.

Alabama joined 36 states and the District with legal same-sex marriage after a federal judge overturned the state’s ban. (For those figuring that’s a HUGE 74%).

On the day that same-sex unions became legal in Alabama, local officials in dozens of counties on Monday defied a federal judge’s decision and refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples, casting the state into judicial chaos.

Gay couples were able to get licenses in about a dozen places, including Birmingham, Huntsville and a few other counties where probate judges complied with the judge’s decision. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled early Monday that it would deny Alabama’s request to put the marriages on hold.

This action by the US Supreme Court is a step in maneuvering towards the goal of “Usurpation of politics” insofar as it rightly appears that the local, state, and Supreme Court’s of thirty seven states as well as the District of Columbia are not requisite with earlier decisions made by the federal government.

But in the majority of counties, officials said they would refuse to license same-sex marriages or stop providing licenses altogether, confronting couples — gay and heterosexual — with locked doors and shuttered windows.

Many of the state’s 68 probate judges mounted their resistance to the federal decision at the urging of the firebrand chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Roy Moore. He is best known for refusing more than a decade ago to comply with a court order to remove a monument to the Ten Commandments from the state Supreme Court’s offices.

But the probate judge in Mobile — scene of the most high-profile confrontation — has also asked for legal clarification from the Alabama Supreme Court in a counter move.

It was this court’s chief justice, Roy Moore, who had initially advised the probate judges not to give out the licenses.

“For now, we’re going to maintain the status quo,” the aide, Mark Erwin, told a crowd of about 20 people gathered at probate court.

Despite the chaos, hundreds of gay and lesbian Alabama couples managed to get marriage licenses Monday, activists said.

Some activists believe the state’s chief justice Moore also has intimidated probate judges. A letter late Sunday from Moore claimed probate judges could face reprimands from the governor if they issued same-sex marriage licenses.


The Sickening Abuses and Schemes of Obama

Earlier this morning after a brief discussion with our team I stated that “My fear is of major concern for our Nation – it’s not about various policies that like brief streams of wind come and go because for what it’s worth that is precisely what politicians do (and the staff here realize that I am definitely referring to human communication, twisting words, and making mockery out of context within a given content – [continuing] I stated that my biggest fear for me, mine, you, yours, and the entire lot of people living in America is none other than this man…Barack Obama.”

Paraphrasing here I also made mention of how could anyone living in this nation – America – possibly vote for this guy. Furthermore, upon being asked why, I very simply stated that I felt that not only was President Obama not qualified to be the POTUS; moreover, I feel that he is dangerous to the health, safety, and welfare of the Nation.

Naturally our earlier briefing session was longer than any of us thought it would be but there is one complete line of substantiated facts that we will never hear at a debate, or any public policy speech.

There should not be an American or anyone existing in this country that could possibly turn a blind eye, or non-hearing ears to the travesties that have occurred on Barack Obama’s watch – yet with the assistance of the mainstream media, as well as the gullibility of the people, including the lassie-faire consciousness and reluctance for people to do – efficacy – the notion of making a change in the political system of our nation. Therefore, again I reiterated that a vote for any other person running for the office of the President of the United States would be better than a condoning vote for Barack Obama.

We have addressed the relationship of content and context on this site for years. In addition, we have discussed the options of comparing and contrasting events. These parameters often used in History classes or Literature classes in the form of essays are asking for just that; foretelling by comparing or contrasting the facts that have occurred with what would or could be a more desirable outcome.

First we want to address content of what was stated by Obama on Sunday September 12, 2012 and we will present to you the actual words. Our question is what context was the language used? For example, was the President explaining an event that occurred; or, was he manipulating all of the content to prove his assertion that he did in fact, call the events that happened in Benghazi, Libya a “Terrorist Attack”?

From this point it is very conceivable that based on how the content was manipulated (out of context) as to why the events of the next fourteen days occurred namely the use of a video tape, a non-structured riot, the Nation’s Ambassador to the United Nations making appearances on all the Sunday morning shows, and finally the gumption of an unbiased press to contrast the White House’s story and subsequently, the official story.

The following is a transcript of the actual proceedings pursuant to last night’s debate with special emphasis given to the content, context, and the comparing and contrasting that for me represent a clear and present danger to those of us in America with Barack Obama as president.

Mr. Obama did make reference to the fact that “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,” but his comments that day also appeared to reference the video, when he said, “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.” The administration changed its description of the attack, eventually describing it as a terror attack linked to al Qaeda sympathizers. Although this is what President Obama claims as his definition of calling what happened in Benghazi a “Terrorist” attack? “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.”

Please see today’s edition of the Wall Street Journal for a complete analysis with text and video to support what was actually said. Please click here.

Please understand that the attempt of President Obama alleging that in the Rose Garden he made mention of the Benghazi attack remotely or even quasi-significant as a “Terrorist attack” is nothing more than manipulation of content within the parameters of the communiqué. This is what is often referred to as “taken out of context” and in this instance he sure did. The manipulation of words is perhaps one of the most deceitful means of scheming and launching horrendous fabrications.

“But let him ask in faith without any doubting, for the one who doubts is like the surf of the sea driven and tossed by the wind. For let not that man expect that he will receive anything from the Lord, being a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways.” (James 1:6-8)

Why not just sit it out and let the Government think for us..?

Because like it or not that is what is precisely going on in our country. Our government has maneuvered itself into every aspect of our lives; moreover, they’ve even suggested or even regulated what we should be doing. Let’s look at the “through no fault of their own” syndrome.

When it comes right down to the ideals of Comprehensive Immigration Reform we readily admit that there are some issues that either by hook or crook or unforeseen disingenuous circumstances haven’t even been given a thought. Well one might ask, what is the difficulty now? Actually it is an identifiable symptom that has been here forever, and that unchanging.

As we look at the public education system in this country; moreover, the lack of certain life skills that an individual needs to live as reasonable and as prosperous as they are able to do, we foresee this aspect as potentially one of our greatest resources – once people can speak freely without threat or regulation that dictates otherwise.

The reason we were alarmed at the public education system and its failure to educate even the most essential skills has indeed cornered us into a most heinous, unethical, and lack of moral turpitude that stymies even those with thinking skills. Therefore, seeing that moral turpitude is a legal concept in the United States that refers to “conduct that is considered contrary to community standards of justice, honesty, or good morals…” we would appeal to anyone the following notion:

How and even why is it that at the end of the academic year we see high school graduates in a colorful array of regalia holding signs that read, “What Now or What do we do now?” Make no mistake about it, we have always been offended by these colorful sign carriers insofar as they seem to be asking, “…okay now what do I do…”

Here is our problem with this out of control mess. Has the U.S. federal government put so many regulations a la the Fourteenth Amendment and protected status so as to inhibit educators, teachers, administrators, and especially counselors from being able to make inquiry and assist these potential victims. Or has it been a situation of willful discrimination to hold these students back from their aspiring dreams because the government wants them to be dependent upon them?

We would agree that to do nothing in their plight is unethical and simply wrong. Indeed going this far into history imitating an ostrich with its head in the sand regarding a dysfunctional immigration program is about as inhumane and morally crude as anyone could ever be.

Therefore, all of immigration reform policy should be dedicated to these potential victims. Two things about loyalty I can’t seem to ever forget, nor do I want too: If we educators took some time and mentioned available options to their students is very much like the ancient Chinese proverb that states “…Buy someone a fish sandwich to eat…you have purchased the person a meal; however, by teaching that same person how to fish… you feed him for a lifetime.” Therefore, knowing at the limited amount of time, say 1986 up to now in 2012 or 26 – years has created a dependency problem for the child immigrant and average American taxpayer albeit local and federal taxation.

Now insofar as the federal government and or their parties of representation want or seem to want nothing to do with it — working toward improving America’s hopeless immigration problems — wouldn’t it therefore be equitable to legislate some kind of program where the Democrat or the Republican Party national foundations should be assisting to exonerate America from this problem? Look at what has been spent thus far on the election per individual: Barack Obama has spent approximately $200 million whereas Mitt Romney has spent around $150 million. Since the last amnesty granted by President Reagan — 26 years ago — there have been 2 Republican presidents for a total of 12 years; likewise we have had 2 Democrat presidents for a total of 12 years and one Democrat president whose granted amnesty again for about 1.5 million people.

And by a huge measure far worse because one either inherits a quasi-literate person dependent upon the federal government for entitlements, or, copious amounts of extra crime, discontent, and civil disobedience.
Somewhere and somehow one must come to the conclusion that this mess needs to be eradicated immediately. The way that it is now the government has created intergenerational dependence which is never acceptable and gets more costly.

And from this point it only gets worse. Hasn’t anyone ever asked a person who is illegally in the country at the behest of their parents; “So what have you done to straighten out this type of problem you’re in? Have you gone to see a school counselor? Have you spoken with your parents about it? Have you made independent inquiry from the government and its trusty bureaucratic agencies like, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)? How about ICE or Border Patrol Agents? Why not ask the Department of Homeland Security?

Well we have! Primarily because it is hard for us to understand how or why anyone could leave at least 75% of their lifetime totally up for grabs. Or would we be better off with the attitude of “…okay you’ve finished high school, now go back to your country of origin…”

We believe that with the intervening federal government into every aspect of an individual’s life – including, but certainly not limited too – questions that can be asked versus those that can’t be asked; no level-headed educator wants to get sued for asking someone they’re trying to assist with the hereafter high school dilemma…oh but they will!

And please…we published an earlier article that suggested the availability of parental assistance with the notion that these children who are in America as “no fault of their own” rather because of what their parents did we would like to suggest a quid pro quo scenario. (Please click here for much needed reading!)

It was in the manner in which it became law…

The news from the United States Supreme Court really should have surprised us this morning. And we are sorry that it did not. Faith, hope, and good will are not matters that are inherent in humankind. At the very onset when all news outlets we were either watching or listening to and the qualified pundits of such – at first – made the announcement that the Individual mandate had been struck down and deemed unconstitutional.

Inasmuch as we saw how this piece of legislation was put together – considering all of the bribery, pay-outs, and porkulus spending promises – realistically the show should have been stopped there and then. It was the machinations of House leadership and members, as well as the shenanigans, questionable acts, and deceitful scheming of the Senate leadership as well as its members were criminal.

And then with the majority of Americans not wanting anything to do with this Obamacare legislation insofar as by this time it had been soiled in smut with the closed-door meetings, the backhanded deals, and just who were these people trying to kid?

I would hate to think if even for a moment that those of us living in America are that stupid and ignorant not to believe in an “Affordable Care Act” without first reading the bill in its entirety, and at the very least having the bill posted (as promised) for us which of course were campaign promises made by our President.   Now needless to say that the pundits, reporters, even members of the law community got the decision wrong – which as you know by now with every trick in the book  and questionable acts the monkey-business calling itself the Affordable Care Act was ruled constitutional by way of taxation.

Make no mistake about it people – we’ve been had by the most corrupt consort of people ever to step into Washington D.C. The Affordable Care Act a $500 billion tax increase — borrowing language from the Supreme Court decision, which ruled that the mandate to purchase health insurance is constitutional because Congress has the power to levy taxes on people who don’t buy it.

House Republicans wasted no time scheduling yet another vote to repeal President Barack Obama’s health care reform law after the Supreme Court’s decision today to uphold its constitutionality.

Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Va.) announced this morning that the House would hold the vote July 11.

“There’s a lot of resolve amongst our colleagues … to stop a law that’s hurting our economy,” Speaker John Boehner said.

“The American people want this bill repealed,” the Ohio Republican said.

That, of course, won’t happen anytime soon. The House has repeatedly passed repeal measures during the past 18 months, none of which have been taken up by the Senate, which is controlled by Democrats.

The best chance Republicans have for a full repeal of the law is if they win both the White House and a majority in the Senate this November. In fact, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney made just that point today.

“Our mission is clear: If we want to get rid of Obamacare, we’re going to have replace President Obama,” he said. What this country needs is leadership that is on the straight and narrow; given that we as well as the Founding Fathers know the nature of humankind (human nature) could not serve in government for any length of time…we all know what needs to be done.

Joy Behar wants to interview and Challenge Conservatives “if they have the balls”

TV personality Joy Behar is attacking Mitt Romney for disagreeing with President Obama’s recent call to hire more firemen and other public-sector workers, saying she would like to see one of his homes catch fire.

“Quite openly we’ve come to expect nothing more than this kind of extremely cheap excrement spewing from Joy Behar’s mouth, says William Blake of The News.

“It is one issue to openly use one’s First Amendment rights under the law, Blake continues; however, for a person working for an elite television network (ABC) to state she’d like to see one of his homes to catch fire is beyond the realm of civility.”

Just for those who care – the heyday of politically motivated “comedians” who couldn’t buy a laugh at the Comedy Club or the Improv for their lack of material – who for the goodness of humankind ought to be relegated out to pasture where they belong.

Maher isn’t funny, or witty, or even intelligent; Stewart is even worse, yet nonetheless is carrying Maher’s jock-strap all the way up to Obama. (Now, that is considering that Maher ever had one.)

But I digress…who on earth does Joy Behar think she is? She also is not funny and has very little, if any, political sense whatsoever.

Worse still is her espousing, “I’d like to see his house burn, one of his millions of houses burning down,” said Behar, a co-host on ABC’s “The View” daytime talk show, in an interview with the website Mediaite . “Who’s he going to call, the Mormon fire patrol?”

So now she’s bringing in her brand of comedy… “One of his millions of houses burning down” and then she, of all people fires away with a religious taunt like, “Who’s he going to call, the Mormon fire patrol?”

How does ABC even tolerate this kind of rubbish? O’Donnell made a comment about “The Donald’s” comb-over hair style and was hit by the door before the show’s end.

Behar, recently hired to work on Al Gore’s cable TV station Current, is a former school teacher who reportedly got started in show biz in the 1980s as a standup comic. Easy enough for us to see that the company she keeps is further testament to who she wants to be including Mr Internet-the sky’s on fire-global warming expert, Al Gore as well as Eliot Spitzer and some other savory types.

Behar explains about her new show that she would like to interview and challenge conservatives to come on her show, “if they have the balls.”