Why not just sit it out and let the Government think for us..?

Because like it or not that is what is precisely going on in our country. Our government has maneuvered itself into every aspect of our lives; moreover, they’ve even suggested or even regulated what we should be doing. Let’s look at the “through no fault of their own” syndrome.

When it comes right down to the ideals of Comprehensive Immigration Reform we readily admit that there are some issues that either by hook or crook or unforeseen disingenuous circumstances haven’t even been given a thought. Well one might ask, what is the difficulty now? Actually it is an identifiable symptom that has been here forever, and that unchanging.

As we look at the public education system in this country; moreover, the lack of certain life skills that an individual needs to live as reasonable and as prosperous as they are able to do, we foresee this aspect as potentially one of our greatest resources – once people can speak freely without threat or regulation that dictates otherwise.

The reason we were alarmed at the public education system and its failure to educate even the most essential skills has indeed cornered us into a most heinous, unethical, and lack of moral turpitude that stymies even those with thinking skills. Therefore, seeing that moral turpitude is a legal concept in the United States that refers to “conduct that is considered contrary to community standards of justice, honesty, or good morals…” we would appeal to anyone the following notion:

How and even why is it that at the end of the academic year we see high school graduates in a colorful array of regalia holding signs that read, “What Now or What do we do now?” Make no mistake about it, we have always been offended by these colorful sign carriers insofar as they seem to be asking, “…okay now what do I do…”

Here is our problem with this out of control mess. Has the U.S. federal government put so many regulations a la the Fourteenth Amendment and protected status so as to inhibit educators, teachers, administrators, and especially counselors from being able to make inquiry and assist these potential victims. Or has it been a situation of willful discrimination to hold these students back from their aspiring dreams because the government wants them to be dependent upon them?

We would agree that to do nothing in their plight is unethical and simply wrong. Indeed going this far into history imitating an ostrich with its head in the sand regarding a dysfunctional immigration program is about as inhumane and morally crude as anyone could ever be.

Therefore, all of immigration reform policy should be dedicated to these potential victims. Two things about loyalty I can’t seem to ever forget, nor do I want too: If we educators took some time and mentioned available options to their students is very much like the ancient Chinese proverb that states “…Buy someone a fish sandwich to eat…you have purchased the person a meal; however, by teaching that same person how to fish… you feed him for a lifetime.” Therefore, knowing at the limited amount of time, say 1986 up to now in 2012 or 26 – years has created a dependency problem for the child immigrant and average American taxpayer albeit local and federal taxation.

Now insofar as the federal government and or their parties of representation want or seem to want nothing to do with it — working toward improving America’s hopeless immigration problems — wouldn’t it therefore be equitable to legislate some kind of program where the Democrat or the Republican Party national foundations should be assisting to exonerate America from this problem? Look at what has been spent thus far on the election per individual: Barack Obama has spent approximately $200 million whereas Mitt Romney has spent around $150 million. Since the last amnesty granted by President Reagan — 26 years ago — there have been 2 Republican presidents for a total of 12 years; likewise we have had 2 Democrat presidents for a total of 12 years and one Democrat president whose granted amnesty again for about 1.5 million people.

And by a huge measure far worse because one either inherits a quasi-literate person dependent upon the federal government for entitlements, or, copious amounts of extra crime, discontent, and civil disobedience.
Somewhere and somehow one must come to the conclusion that this mess needs to be eradicated immediately. The way that it is now the government has created intergenerational dependence which is never acceptable and gets more costly.

And from this point it only gets worse. Hasn’t anyone ever asked a person who is illegally in the country at the behest of their parents; “So what have you done to straighten out this type of problem you’re in? Have you gone to see a school counselor? Have you spoken with your parents about it? Have you made independent inquiry from the government and its trusty bureaucratic agencies like, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)? How about ICE or Border Patrol Agents? Why not ask the Department of Homeland Security?

Well we have! Primarily because it is hard for us to understand how or why anyone could leave at least 75% of their lifetime totally up for grabs. Or would we be better off with the attitude of “…okay you’ve finished high school, now go back to your country of origin…”

We believe that with the intervening federal government into every aspect of an individual’s life – including, but certainly not limited too – questions that can be asked versus those that can’t be asked; no level-headed educator wants to get sued for asking someone they’re trying to assist with the hereafter high school dilemma…oh but they will!

And please…we published an earlier article that suggested the availability of parental assistance with the notion that these children who are in America as “no fault of their own” rather because of what their parents did we would like to suggest a quid pro quo scenario. (Please click here for much needed reading!)

Advertisements

It was in the manner in which it became law…

The news from the United States Supreme Court really should have surprised us this morning. And we are sorry that it did not. Faith, hope, and good will are not matters that are inherent in humankind. At the very onset when all news outlets we were either watching or listening to and the qualified pundits of such – at first – made the announcement that the Individual mandate had been struck down and deemed unconstitutional.

Inasmuch as we saw how this piece of legislation was put together – considering all of the bribery, pay-outs, and porkulus spending promises – realistically the show should have been stopped there and then. It was the machinations of House leadership and members, as well as the shenanigans, questionable acts, and deceitful scheming of the Senate leadership as well as its members were criminal.

And then with the majority of Americans not wanting anything to do with this Obamacare legislation insofar as by this time it had been soiled in smut with the closed-door meetings, the backhanded deals, and just who were these people trying to kid?

I would hate to think if even for a moment that those of us living in America are that stupid and ignorant not to believe in an “Affordable Care Act” without first reading the bill in its entirety, and at the very least having the bill posted (as promised) for us which of course were campaign promises made by our President.   Now needless to say that the pundits, reporters, even members of the law community got the decision wrong – which as you know by now with every trick in the book  and questionable acts the monkey-business calling itself the Affordable Care Act was ruled constitutional by way of taxation.

Make no mistake about it people – we’ve been had by the most corrupt consort of people ever to step into Washington D.C. The Affordable Care Act a $500 billion tax increase — borrowing language from the Supreme Court decision, which ruled that the mandate to purchase health insurance is constitutional because Congress has the power to levy taxes on people who don’t buy it.

House Republicans wasted no time scheduling yet another vote to repeal President Barack Obama’s health care reform law after the Supreme Court’s decision today to uphold its constitutionality.

Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Va.) announced this morning that the House would hold the vote July 11.

“There’s a lot of resolve amongst our colleagues … to stop a law that’s hurting our economy,” Speaker John Boehner said.

“The American people want this bill repealed,” the Ohio Republican said.

That, of course, won’t happen anytime soon. The House has repeatedly passed repeal measures during the past 18 months, none of which have been taken up by the Senate, which is controlled by Democrats.

The best chance Republicans have for a full repeal of the law is if they win both the White House and a majority in the Senate this November. In fact, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney made just that point today.

“Our mission is clear: If we want to get rid of Obamacare, we’re going to have replace President Obama,” he said. What this country needs is leadership that is on the straight and narrow; given that we as well as the Founding Fathers know the nature of humankind (human nature) could not serve in government for any length of time…we all know what needs to be done.

Joy Behar wants to interview and Challenge Conservatives “if they have the balls”

TV personality Joy Behar is attacking Mitt Romney for disagreeing with President Obama’s recent call to hire more firemen and other public-sector workers, saying she would like to see one of his homes catch fire.

“Quite openly we’ve come to expect nothing more than this kind of extremely cheap excrement spewing from Joy Behar’s mouth, says William Blake of The News.

“It is one issue to openly use one’s First Amendment rights under the law, Blake continues; however, for a person working for an elite television network (ABC) to state she’d like to see one of his homes to catch fire is beyond the realm of civility.”

Just for those who care – the heyday of politically motivated “comedians” who couldn’t buy a laugh at the Comedy Club or the Improv for their lack of material – who for the goodness of humankind ought to be relegated out to pasture where they belong.

Maher isn’t funny, or witty, or even intelligent; Stewart is even worse, yet nonetheless is carrying Maher’s jock-strap all the way up to Obama. (Now, that is considering that Maher ever had one.)

But I digress…who on earth does Joy Behar think she is? She also is not funny and has very little, if any, political sense whatsoever.

Worse still is her espousing, “I’d like to see his house burn, one of his millions of houses burning down,” said Behar, a co-host on ABC’s “The View” daytime talk show, in an interview with the website Mediaite . “Who’s he going to call, the Mormon fire patrol?”

So now she’s bringing in her brand of comedy… “One of his millions of houses burning down” and then she, of all people fires away with a religious taunt like, “Who’s he going to call, the Mormon fire patrol?”

How does ABC even tolerate this kind of rubbish? O’Donnell made a comment about “The Donald’s” comb-over hair style and was hit by the door before the show’s end.

Behar, recently hired to work on Al Gore’s cable TV station Current, is a former school teacher who reportedly got started in show biz in the 1980s as a standup comic. Easy enough for us to see that the company she keeps is further testament to who she wants to be including Mr Internet-the sky’s on fire-global warming expert, Al Gore as well as Eliot Spitzer and some other savory types.

Behar explains about her new show that she would like to interview and challenge conservatives to come on her show, “if they have the balls.”

Defining a New Silver Spoon Generation

For some reason this line of dialogue went to our very hearts. First inasmuch as we believe there was a time in United States history that Affirmative Action was a necessary device to assist in leveling the playing field — for those who received the entitlement. Secondly, we also believe that it was a definitive STOP point for those who were held down by Jim Crow laws and the like.

And oh yes I have had members of Hispanic ethnicity, as well as those African American colleagues and friends openly disclose to me — that the most difficult part about getting into UCLA Law and Harvard Law School was in fact — getting out. They each said to me that the roughest thing about getting in to law school was the notion that once you’re in — there is no way your’re getting out. Can we all understand an investment? Well on a microcosmic level these friends of mine openly admitted that they were minorities going to two of the nicest law schools in the country and not making it through would make the universities involved look very bad; therefore, so as not to tarnish any school these students were given amenities that other students never even heard of.

“Really, this ‘silver spoon’ business?” Coulter said. “Are they going to do that about every Republican while simultaneously revering FDR and JFK? They really were pure silver spoon aristocrats inheriting all their money. Mitt Romney gave away all the money he inherited. He made it on his own.” This was something ween’t aware of — although given the individuals credibility, integrity, and dignity with again — who the messenger just happened to be we find that to be overwhelming sufficient.

“And the silver spoon Obama got — I mean that generation, it can’t be denied, you can’t support affirmative action and then pretend it doesn’t exist. You don’t transfer from Occidental [College], which by his own accounts in his autobiography he mostly spent smoking pot, to a fine Ivy League university like Columbia if you’re not checking off ‘black’ on your application. So you know, the silver spoon since I’ve been alive has been an affirmative action silver spoon.”

And while she dismissed the rich-versus-poor meme some Democrats have been promoting, she did say there was another sort of class warfare occurring between those earning money from the government and those whose tax dollars are paying for it.

“I just don’t think Americans are angry at people who go out, work hard and show talent and make the world a better place,” she said. “Do we hate Steve Jobs or Bill Gates?…I think the real class warfare that Americans are hopping mad about is the class warfare between those of us who pay taxes and the people’s whose salary they pay — for their fabulous pensions and they’re partying trips to Las Vegas. And visiting whores in Colombia, and the highest-income counties in the nation not being Beverly Hills or Grosse Point or Greenwich, Conn., but counties all around the seat of government in Washington, D.C.

“That kind of class warfare I think really strikes a chord right now. Not somebody who has worked hard and done well for himself.”

Read more: